The Judgment of Midas: The Price of Poor Taste

Midas appears twice in the Roman mythological tradition, and the two appearances are designed to be read together. In the first, he is given exactly what he asks for — the ability to turn everything he touches into gold — and nearly starves because of it. In the second, which Ovid tells in the Metamorphoses immediately after the first, he has been freed from that curse and might reasonably be expected to have learned something about the dangers of wanting the wrong things. He has not. He wanders into a musical contest between Pan and Apollo, takes the wrong side, and earns a punishment that the Romans found both funny and precise: the ears of a donkey, permanently attached to a king’s head, concealed under a turban but incapable of being permanently kept secret.

The myth of Midas’s judgment is smaller in scale than the golden touch story — no one nearly dies, no divine intervention is required to avert catastrophe — but it is more carefully constructed as a piece of moral argument. It is a myth about the difference between two kinds of music, two kinds of pleasure, and two kinds of mind, and about what it costs to be unable to tell them apart.

Midas Before the Contest

By the time Midas arrives at the contest on Mount Tmolus, he has already had the kind of experience that ought to produce wisdom. He had wished for gold and gotten it. He had watched his food become metal in his hands and his drink solidify before it reached his lips. He had, according to some versions, embraced his daughter and turned her into a golden statue before he understood what his gift actually meant. He had gone to Bacchus — whose follower he was, in whose honor he had originally been granted the wish — and begged to have it removed. Bacchus sent him to wash in the river Pactolus, which ran gold thereafter from what it had drawn out of him.

All of this had happened. Midas knew what it felt like to want something without understanding what it was. He knew what it felt like to receive exactly what he had asked for and find that it was nothing like what he had imagined. He was, in short, a man who had been given a very specific and expensive education in the gap between desire and judgment.

Ovid notes that he wandered after this episode into the countryside, into the hills and forests where Pan played his pipes. This wandering is not incidental. Pan is the god of wild places, of uncultivated nature, of the kind of pleasure that requires nothing from you and asks nothing of you in return. His music — the pipes, the syrinx — was vigorous, immediate, and viscerally appealing. It was the music of the body rather than the mind, of nature rather than culture, of sensation rather than understanding. After the humiliation of the golden touch, Midas had drifted toward exactly this kind of pleasure: uncomplicated, undemanding, requiring no discernment.

The Contest on Mount Tmolus

Pan had challenged Apollo to a contest of music, which was either an act of considerable self-confidence or an act of considerable foolishness, depending on what one thought of Pan’s pipes relative to Apollo’s lyre. The mountain Tmolus served as judge — an old, silent, impartial presence whose age suggested the kind of deep temporal perspective that transcends momentary aesthetic preference. The Muses attended. So did a small crowd of mortal witnesses, among them Midas.

Pan played first. Ovid’s account does not slight the performance — the pipes produced something genuinely appealing, wild and vigorous and rhythmically compelling. The air moved with it. The nymphs responded. It was music that worked on the body directly, that produced pleasure without requiring anything of the listener beyond the capacity to hear it and respond.

Then Apollo played. What the lyre produced was categorically different in kind, not just in degree. It was organized according to principles that the body could feel but the mind had to understand in order to fully receive — harmony in the technical sense, intervals calibrated to each other according to mathematical ratios that Pythagorean philosophy would later identify as the same ratios governing the movement of the heavenly bodies. Apollo’s music was not simply more refined than Pan’s. It was music that made an argument about the structure of the cosmos, that organized sound according to the same principles by which Jupiter organized the divine order. To hear it fully was to hear something about how the world was put together.

Tmolus deliberated and gave his verdict to Apollo. The mountain had no difficulty with the decision. It was not close.

Then Midas dissented.

The Verdict and Its Punishment

The dissent itself is the key moment in the myth, and it is worth being precise about what Midas actually did. He did not simply say he preferred Pan’s music — there is no law against preferring one kind of music to another. He said, in effect, that Tmolus’s judgment was wrong: that Pan’s music was better than Apollo’s, that the vigorous immediacy of the pipes outweighed the ordered complexity of the lyre, that what he had enjoyed was the superior thing.

This was a specific kind of error. It was not ignorance in the simple sense — Midas had heard both performances. It was the confident expression of a preference as a judgment, the elevation of what pleased him into a claim about what was actually better, without any recognition that his pleasure might be an unreliable guide to value. He preferred what required nothing of him over what asked him to understand. He mistook the ease of his pleasure for a sign of its quality. And he said so in the presence of a god whose entire domain was organized around the principle that beauty and truth were not separable — that genuine aesthetic discernment was not a matter of taste but a matter of moral and intellectual development.

Apollo’s response was calibrated to the nature of the error. He did not destroy Midas or afflict him with suffering. He touched the king’s ears and transformed them into the ears of a donkey — large, mobile, unmistakably animal, attached to the head of a Phrygian king. The punishment was a revelation rather than an addition: it made visible, in the king’s physical form, the quality of perception that had produced the wrong verdict. Donkeys are not known for the refinement of their hearing. They hear sounds without understanding them, respond to what is loud and immediate without distinguishing between what is better and what is merely more obvious. Midas had judged like a donkey. Now he looked like one, at least in the relevant feature.

The Barber and the Reeds

Midas wrapped his head in a turban and told no one. The shame was manageable as long as it was contained — as long as the gap between his public dignity as a king and the physical mark of his error remained concealed. He required one person to know: his barber, who had to see the ears in order to do his work, and who was sworn to silence on pain of whatever a Phrygian king could do to a barber who talked.

The barber held his secret for a period that Ovid describes as a sustained and genuine torment. The knowledge required an outlet. It was too large for one person to contain, too strange and too significant to simply absorb without expression. Eventually he went to a meadow, dug a hole in the ground, whispered into it that King Midas had donkey’s ears, covered the hole, and left. The secret was in the earth. The earth would keep it.

Reeds grew on the spot. When the wind passed through them, they repeated what had been whispered into the ground beneath them: Midas has ass’s ears. The air carried it. The valley learned it. The secret Midas had concealed under his turban spread across the countryside in the voices of plants that had absorbed it from the soil.

Ovid is doing something specific with this detail. The earth does not keep secrets. It transforms them — it takes what has been buried in it and sends it back up in a different form, through the mouths of the things that grow from it. The barber’s attempt to discharge his burden without betraying his master failed not because the barber was disloyal but because the truth he was carrying was the kind that cannot be permanently contained. It found expression through the world’s own materials, through the reeds that grew from the place where he had tried to bury it.

What the Romans Understood by It

The myth of Midas’s judgment sits in a cluster of related myths in the Metamorphoses — the death of Orpheus, the punishment of Marsyas — all of which involve Apollo and music and the consequences of getting something wrong about the relationship between the two. Ovid placed them together deliberately, and they illuminate each other.

The common thread is a specific Roman claim about what aesthetic judgment actually is. In the Roman philosophical tradition, particularly as it was shaped by Stoic and Platonic influences, the capacity to perceive beauty correctly was not a natural gift distributed at birth. It was a developed capacity, a form of perception that required cultivation and that was inseparable from moral and intellectual development more broadly. The person who could genuinely hear Apollo’s music — who could receive it fully rather than simply process it as organized sound — was not simply a person with good ears. They were a person who had developed the kind of mind that could follow the argument the music was making.

Midas could not. He had the physical capacity for hearing — he heard both performances — but he lacked the developed perception necessary to understand what he had heard. His preference for Pan was not simply a difference of taste. It was a symptom of a deeper incapacity, the same incapacity that had led him to wish for gold in the first place: the confusion of what pleased him immediately with what was actually good, the inability to distinguish between what the senses reported and what reason would confirm.

The donkey ears were the appropriate punishment because they made the incapacity legible. They did not add something foreign to Midas. They revealed something that was already there, that had been governing his judgments all along, that the golden touch episode had already demonstrated and the musical contest confirmed. Midas had always been judging with donkey ears. Now the world could see it.

Share This Page